رابطه ی علی پیوند والدینی با قلدری در مدرسه با میانجی‌گری ویژگی‌های شخصیتی دانش‌آموز و کیفیت ارتباط معلم-دانش‌آموز در دانش‌آموزان پسرسال دوم دبیرستان شهر اهواز: یک مدل پیسنهادی

نوع مقاله : مقاله کاربردی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد روان‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران

2 دانشیار گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران

3 استاد گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران

چکیده

افراد در زندگی به دلیل مواجهه با موقعیتهای غیرقابل پیش بینی و شرایط دشوار زندگی به‌طور پیوسته در زندگی به مشاوره و راهنمایی نیاز دارند. پژوهش حاضر با هدف تعیین تاثیر مشاوره گروهی با رویکرد راه­حل مدار بر عملکرد خانواده و رضایت زناشویی زنان شهر مشهد اجرا گردید. پژوهش حاضر یک پژوهش کاربردی و از نوع شبه آزمایشی بود (طرح پیش آزمون و پس‌آزمون با گروه کنترل). جامعه پژوهش شامل کلیه زنان متاهل مراجعه‌کننده به مرکز مشاوره دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد در سال 1393 بود، که 20 زن متأهل از میان شرکت‌کنندگان با روش نمونه­گیری داوطلبانه انتخاب شدند و به‌طور تصادفی در گروه آزمایش و گروه کنترل قرار گرفتند. آزمودنی­ها پرسشنامه رضایت زناشویی انریچ و مقیاس عملکرد خانواده (FAD-1) در دو نوبت پیش آزمون و پس آزمون را تکمیل کردند. زنان گروه آزمایش در 8 جلسه درمان با رویکرد راه حل مدار و هر جلسه به مدت 2 ساعت شرکت کردند و زنان گروه کنترل هیچ مداخله­ای دریافت نکردند. داده­ها با استفاده از آزمون تحلیل کوواریانس یک راهه و نرم‌افزار 21-SPSS تحلیل شدند. نتایج نشان داد که اثر مشاوره گروهی راه­حل مدار بر عملکرد خانواده و رضایت زناشویی گروه آزمایش به‌طور معناداری مؤثر است. به هر حال، می­توان نتیجه گرفت که به کارکرد نامناسب خانواده و رضایت زناشویی پایین در زنان متاهل می­تواند تحت تاثیر مشاوره گروهی راه­حل مدار بهبود پیدا کند. همچنین این رویکرد می‌تواند برای ارتقای رضایت زناشویی و عملکرد خانواده به‌عنوان یک روش کارآمد در حوزه خانواده به‌کار گرفته شود.
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Solution-Focused Group Counseling on Family Function and Marital Satisfaction

نویسندگان [English]

  • Razieh Mansoory Nejad 1
  • Naser Behroozy 2
  • Manijeh shehni-Yailagh 3
1 MA student in psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
3 Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
چکیده [English]

Due to unpredictable situations and difficult living conditions, people continuously need advice and guidance in life. The current study aimed to determine the effect of solution-focused group counseling on family function and marital satisfaction of married women in Mashhad city. The present study is an applied research of a quasi experimental-type (pre and post-test design with control group). The study population includes all married women referred to the Counseling center of Faculty of Education & Psychology of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad in 1393; using voluntary sampling method, 20 married women were selected and were randomly assigned in experiment group and control group. The participants completed Marital Satisfaction Questionnaire and Family Functioning Scale (FAD-1) in the pre-test and post-test. The experiment group women participated in eight 120-minute sessions with solution-focused approach, and the control group received no intervention. Data were analyzed using one-way covariance analysis and SPSS-21 software. The results showed that solution-focused group counseling on family function and marital satisfaction is effective significantly higher than experiment group. However, it can be concluded that family dysfunction and low marital satisfaction in married women could improve by solution-focused group counseling. Also, this approach can be used in the family area to promote marital satisfaction and family function as an efficient method to be employed in the family field.
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Solution-focused group counseling
  • family function
  • Marital satisfaction
احدی، بتول (1386). رابطه شخصیت و رضایت زناشویی. روان شناسی معاصر، 2، 37-31.
زاهدیان، فتح الله؛ کیمیایی، مسعود و سامانی، سیامک (1390). نقش سبک­های دلبستگی، پیوند والدینی و خودپنداره جنسی در اعتیاد. مجله روانشناسی بالینی، 3، 3، 73-65. 
شاقیان، زینب؛ آگیلار وفایی، ماریا و رسول­زاده طباطبایی، سیدکاظم (1390). بررسی طرح واره­ها و پیوند والدینی در دختران نوجوان با وزن طبیعی، چاق و یا دارای علائم بی اشتهایی عصبی. مجله پژوهشی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شهید بهشتی، 16، 1، 38 -30.
شهنی ییلاق، منیجه؛ عزیزی مهر، الهه و مکتبی، غلامحسین (1392). رابطه­ی علی تعارض آشکار و تعارض نهان بین والدین با عملکرد تحصیلی با میانجی­گری رابطه­ی والد-فرزند، رفتار ضد اجتماعی و افسردگی در دانش­آموزان دبیرستانی. فصلنامه مشاوره کاربردی، 3، 2، 16-1.
 
Ahmed, C., & Braithwaite, U. (2004). Bullying and victimization: cause for concern for both Families and Schools. Social Psychology of Education, 7(1), 35-54.
Ang, R. P., Chong, W. H., Huan, V. S., Quek, C. L., & Yeo, L. S. (2008). Teacher–student relationship inventory: Testing for invariance across upper elementary and junior high samples. Journal of Psycho educational Assessment, 26, 339–349.
Arbeau, K. A., Coplan, R. J., & Weeks, M. (2010). Shyness, teacher–child relationships, and socio-emotional adjustment in grade 1. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 34, 259–269.
Avagianou, P. A., & Zafiropoulou, M. (2008). Parental bonding and depression: Personality as a mediating factor. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 20(3), 261-269.
Baldry, A. C., & Farrington, D. P. (1998). Parenting influences on bullying and victimization. Criminal and Legal Psychology, 3, 237–254.
 Bidjerano, T., & Yun Dai, D. (2007). The relationship between the Big-Five model of personality and self-regulated learning strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 69–81.
Birch, S. H., & Ladd, G. W. (1998). Children’s interpersonal behaviors and the teacher–child       relationship. Developmental Psychology, 34, 934–946.
 Bollmer, J. M., Harris, M. J., & Milich, R. (2006). Reactions to bullying and peer victimization: Narratives, physiological arousal, and personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 803–828.
Book, A.S., Volk, A. A., & Hosker, A. (2012). Adolescent bullying and personality: An adaptive approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 218- 223.
Chambers, J. A., Power, K. G., Loucks, N., & Swanson, V. (2000). Psychometric properties of the parental bonding instrument and its association with psychological distress in a group of incarcerated young offenders in Scotland. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 35(7),318-25.
Connolly, I., & O’Moore, M. (2003). Personality and family relations of children who bully. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 559-567.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (2005). Changing minds, Big Five Factor. National Institutes of Health, 21(5), 303-307.
  David, S. B., Margaret B., & Michael, L. (2005). Antecedents of emotion knowledge: Predictors of individual differences in young children. Cognition and Emotion, 19(3), 375-396.
  Diener, E., Larsen, R. J., & Emmons, R. A. (1984). Person x situation interactions: Choice of situations and congruence response models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 580–592.
Dijkstra, P., & Barelds, D. P. H. (2008). Self and partner personality and responses to relationship threats. Journal of Research in Personality, 42,1500-1511.
 Eskisua, M. (2014) .The relationship between bullying, family functions and perceived social support among high school students. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 159, 492 – 496. 
Furukawa, T. (1992). Perceived parental rearing, personality and mental status in Japanese adolescents.  Journal of  Adolescence, 15, 322-317.
Graziano, W. G., Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Hair, E. C. (1996). Perceiving interpersonal conflict and reacting to it: The case for agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 820–835.
Hamre, B., & Pianta, R. (2001). Early teacher–child relationships and the trajectory of       children’s school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72, 625–638.
  Hastings, S. E., & O’ Neill, T. A. (2009). Predicting workplace deviance broad versus narrow personality variables. Personality and Individual Differences. 47(4), 289-293.
  Howes, C., Phillipsen, L. C., & Peisner Feinberg, E. (2000). The consistency of perceived teacher–child relationships between preschool and kindergarten. Journal of School Psychology, 38, 113–132.
 Hughes, J. N., Gleason, K. A. & Zhang, D. (2005). Relationship influences on teachers’ perceptions of academic competence in academically at-risk minority and majority first grade students. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 303–320. 
Kendler, K. S.,  Kessler, R. C., Neale, M. C., Heath, A. C., & Eaves, L. J. (1993). The prediction of major depression in women toward an integrated etiologic mode. American Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 1139–1148.
Klevens, J., & Hall, J. (2014). The importance of parental warmth, support, and control in preventing adolescent misbehavior. Journal of Child and Adolescent Behavior, 2 (1), 1-8.
Lamb, M. E., & Tamis-Lemonda, C. (2004). The role of father. In M. E Lamb (Ed.). The role of the father in child development, 1-31. New York: Wiley.
LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (2001). Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: Evidence of differential relationships with Big Five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 326–336.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1985). Updating Norman's adequate taxonomy: Intelligence and personality dimensions in natural language and in questionnaires. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 710-721.
Meehan, B. T., Hughes, J. N., & Cavell, T. A. (2003). Teacher–student relationships as compensatory resources for aggressive children. Child Development, 74, 1145–1157.
Menesini, E., Camodeca, M., & Nocentini, A. (2010). Bullying among siblings: The role of personality and relational variables. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28, 921–939.
Misopoulou, E., & Giovazolias, T. (2013). The relationship between perceived parental bonding and bullying: The mediating role of empathy. The European­ Journal of       Counseling Psychology, 2(1), 1-16.
Mitsopoulou, E., & Giovazolias, T. (2015). Personality traits, empathy and bullying behavior: A meta-analytic approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 21, 61–72.
Murray, Ch., & Zvoch, K. (2011a). The Inventory of Teacher-Student Relationships: factor structure, reliability, and validity among African American youth in low-income urban schools. Journal of Early Adolescence, 31(4), 493–525.
Murray, Ch., & Zvoch, K. (2011b). Teacher-student relationships among behaviorally at risk African American youth from low-income backgrounds: student perceptions, teacher perceptions, and socio-emotional adjustment correlates. Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 19(1), 41– 54.
Mynard, H., & Joseph, S. (1997). Bully/victim problems and their association with Eysenck’s personality dimensions in 8 to 13-year olds. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 51–54.
 Nakao, K., Takaishi, J., Tatsuta, K., Katayama, H., Iwase, M., Yorifuji, K., & Takeda, M. (2000). The influences of family environment on personality traits. Journal of         Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 54, 91-95.
Natvig, G., Albrektsen, G., & Qvarnstrom, U. (2001). School-related stress experience as a           risk factor for bullying behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 30, 561−575.
Ojedokun, O., Ogungbamila, A., & Kehinde, D. (2013). Perception of parental bonding and tendency to perpetrate aggressive behavior in a sample of Nigerian students. Frontiers in Psychological and Behavioral Science, 2(3), 117-124.
Olweus, D. (1993). Bully/victim problem in school: Know ledge base and a effective intervention program. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 18, 197-190.
Papanikolaou, M., Chatzikoma, T., & Kleio, K. (2011). Bullying at school: The role of family. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 433- 442.
Parker, G., Tupling, H., & Brown, L. B. (1979). A Parental Bonding Instrument. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 52, 1-10.
Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2011). Traditional and nontraditional bullying among youth: A Test of General Strain Theory. Journal of Youth and Society, 43(2), 727- 751.#3
Pleck, J. H. (2007). Why could father involvement benefit children? Theoretical perspectives.  Applied Development Science, 11, 196-202.#3
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effect in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Method, 40, 879-891.
Resnick, M. D., Bearman, P. S., Blum, R. W., Bauman, K., Harris, K.M., Jones, J., (1997). Protecting adolescents from harm: Findings from the national longitudinal study of adolescent health. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278, 823– 832.  
Rudasill, K. M., & Rimm-Kaufman, S. E. (2009). Teacher-child relationship quality: The roles of child temperament and teacher-child interaction. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 24, 107-120.
Russ, E., Heim, A., & Westen, D. (2003). Parental bonding and personality pathology assessed by clinician report. Journal of Personality Disorders, 17(6), 522-536.
Sanders, C. E., & Phye, G. D. (2004). Bullying: Implications for the classroom. London. Elsevier Academic Press.
Scott, T. M., Nelson, C. M., & Liaupsin, C. J. (2001). Effective instruction: The forgotten component in preventing school violence. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 285(16), 309-322.
Smith, P. K., & Brain, B. F. (2000). Bullying in the school. Lessons from two decades of research. Aggressive Behavior, 26, 1-9.
Tengteng, T., &  Naiyi, W. (2013). The influence of student personality and teacher-student interactions on teacher-student relationship quality. Journal Beijing Normal University (Social Science), 1, 174-177.
Thijs, J., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2009). Toward a further understanding of teachers' reports of early teacher–child relationships: Examining the roles of behavior appraisals and attributions. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 24, 186–197.
Wang, Y., Liu, Y. H., & Li, Y. M. (2004). Personality types and influencing factors of juvenile aged 10 to 14 years old in Beijing. Chinese Journal of Clinical Rehabilitation, 8, 7481-7483.
Williams, E., & Radin, N. (1999). Effects of father participation in child rearing: Twenty-year follow-up. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 69, 328-336.
 Williams, C. L., Harfmann, E. J., Ingram, R. E.,  Kelsey, E., Hagan, K. E., & Kramer, N. M. (2015). Specificity of parental bonding and rumination in depressive and anxious emotional distress. Personality and Individual Differences, 79, 157–161.
Zee, M., Koomen, H. M., & Van der Veen, I. (2013). Student-teacher relationship quality and academic adjustment in upper elementary school: the role of student personality.Journal of School Psychology, 51(4), 517-533