مشاوره کاربردی

مشاوره کاربردی

ساخت و اعتباریابی مقیاس کمال گرایی انتخاب همسر

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان
1 دانشیار، گروه مشاوره ، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه حضرت معصومه(س)، قم، ایران
2 استادیار، گروه مشاوره ، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه حضرت معصومه(س)، قم، ایران
چکیده
ازدواج به طور قابل توجهی بر رفاه فردی و سلامت اجتماعی تأثیر می­گذارد. کاهش اخیر نرخ ازدواج، به ویژه در ایران، نیاز به تحقیق در مورد عوامل مؤثر بر آن را ضروری کرده است. کمال­گرایی، به ویژه در انتخاب همسر، نقش مهمی در شکل دادن به نگرش­ها و تصمیمات ازدواج دارد. در همین راستا این مطالعه با هدف ساخت و اعتبارسنجی مقیاسی برای سنجش کمال­گرایی در زمینۀ انتخاب همسر انجام گرفت. این مقیاس بر اساس بررسی جامع ادبیات و معیارهای شناسایی شده برای انتخاب همسر تهیه شد. این مقیاس در ابتدا با 47 گویه با تمرکز بر ابعادی مانند عشق، مراقبت، خانواده­های اصلی، ویژگی­های شخصیتی، وضعیت اقتصادی، شغل و ظاهر ایجاد شد. در مجموع 343 شرکت­کننده دختر دانشگاه­های دولتی قم به روش نمونه­گیری خوشه­ای انتخاب (در دو مرحله، ساخت  246  نفر و اعتباریابی 97 نفر) و مقیاس را تکمیل کردند. داده­ها با استفاده از SPSS-22 برای تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفت. آزمون KMO و بارتلت برای ارزیابی کفایت داده ها انجام شد. نتایج تحلیل عاملی با چرخش واریمکس دو عامل اصلی را شناسایی کرد: «شباهت و عشق» و «وضعیت اقتصادی و ظاهر فیزیکی». نتایج تحلیل عامل اکتشافی نشان داد که 29 گویه بر روی دو عامل مجزا بارگذاری می‌شوند: «شباهت و عشق» (16 گویه) و «وضعیت ظاهری و اقتصادی» (13 گویه). عامل "شباهت و عشق" بر اهمیت سازگاری عاطفی و رابطه­ای تاکید می­کند، در حالی که عامل "وضعیت اقتصادی و فیزیکی" بر ویژگی­های مادی و فیزیکی تمرکز دارد. ضرایب آلفای کرونباخ عامل اول 90/0، عامل دوم 85/0 و کل مقیاس 90/0 محاسبه شد. اعتبار ملاک همزمان با همبستگی معنی‌دار با مقیاس‌ کمال‌گرایی مثبت و منفی تأیید شد. این مقیاس بینش‌های ارزشمندی را در مورد تمایلات کمال‌گرایانه مؤثر بر انتخاب همسر ارائه می‌کند و می‌تواند برای تحقیقات بیشتر و کاربردهای عملی در درک و پرداختن به کمال‌گرایی در زمینه‌های انتخاب همسر مورد استفاده قرار گیرد
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Construction and Validation of the Spouse Selection Perfectionism Scale

نویسندگان English

Yadollah Zargar 1
Abolfazl Hatami Varzaneh 2
1 Associate Professor, Department of Counseling, Faculty of Humanities, University of Hazrat-e Masoumeh University, Qom, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department, of Counseling, Faculty of Humanities, University of Hazrat-e Masoumeh University, Qom, Iran
چکیده English

 Marriage significantly affects individual well-being and social health. The recent decrease in the marriage rate, especially in Iran, has necessitated the need for research on the factors affecting it. Perfectionism, especially in choosing a spouse, plays an important role in shaping attitudes and decisions about marriage. In this regard, this study was conducted with the aim of building and validating a scale to measure perfectionism in the field of choosing a spouse. At first, the perfectionism scale for choosing a spouse was prepared based on a comprehensive review of the literature and identified criteria for choosing a spouse. This scale was initially created with 47 items focusing on dimensions such as love, care, families of origin, personality traits, economic status, occupation, and appearance. A total of 343 participants (in two stages, construction, 246 people and validation, 97 people) completed the scale, which was analyzed using SPSS-22 for exploratory factor analysis. KMO and Bartlett's test were performed to evaluate data adequacy. Factor analysis with varimax rotation identified two main factors: "similarity and love" and "economic status and physical appearance". The results of factor analysis showed that 29 items or questions are loaded on two separate factors: "similarity and love" (16 items) and "economic and physical status" (13 items). The "similarity and love" factor emphasizes the importance of emotional and relational compatibility, while the “appearance and economic status” factor focuses on material and physical characteristics. The scale showed high reliability, with Cronbach's alpha coefficients of 0.90 for the total scale, 0.90 for the first factor, and 0.85 for the second factor. The validity of the criterion was confirmed with a significant correlation with the scale of positive and negative perfectionism. It can be said that this scale provides valuable insights about perfectionistic tendencies affecting the choice of a spouse and can be used for further research and practical applications in understanding and dealing with perfectionism in marital contexts.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

perfectionism
spouse selection
validation
factor analysis
Alaei, M., & Haghi, G. (2014). An examination of marriage selection criteria and related social factors: A case study of teachers in Germi and Parsabad counties. Journal of human science research, 6(33), 49-72. (Persian).
Besharat, M. A. (2019). Development and validation of Spiritual/Religious Perfectionism Scale: A preliminary study. Rooyesh-e-Ravanshenasi Journal (RRJ), 7(12), 399-415.‏ (Persian). http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.2383353.1397.7.12.27.8
Besharat, M. A. (2009). Reliability and factor validity of a Farsi version of the Positive and Negative Perfectionism Scale. Psychological Reports, 105(1), 99-110. (Persian). https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.105.1.99-110
Bahrami, M., & Rasouli Sohri, F. (2014). Construction and validation of academic perfectionism scale. The second international conference on new researches in management and humanities. Tehran, Iran. (Persian).
Darban, F., Azimi Roudkenar, F., Ghaffari, F., & Azimi Roudkenar, S. (2017). Study the criteria of choosing spouse from the perspective of the students in Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. Quarterly Journal of Caspian Health and Aging, 2(1), 44-52.‏ (Persian).  https://doi.org/10.22088/cjhaa.2.1.44
Diehl, A. B. R. P., Euzebio, L. D. C., & Mosmann, C. P. (2021). Perfectionist personality and marital relationship: a systematic review. Contextos Clínicos, 14(1), 186-203.‏
Dunn, J. G., Dunn, J. C., Gotwals, J. K., Vallance, J. K., Craft, J. M., & Syrotuik, D. G. (2006). Establishing construct validity evidence for the Sport Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7(1), 57-79.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2005.04.003
Farrokhi, A., Motesharee, E., Zeyd Abadi, R., Aghasi, S., & Parsa, G. R. (2013). Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of Sport Perfectionism Scale in Iranian Athletes. Journal of Sports and Motor Development and Learning, 5(1), 55-76. (Persian).  https://doi.org/10.22059/jmlm.2013.35004
Flett, G. L., Hewitt, P. L., Blankstein, K. R., & Mosher, S. W. (1991). Perfectionism and self-actualization, and personal adjustment. Journal of social Behavior and Personality, 6(5), 147.‏ https://awspntest.apa.org/record/1991-24209-001
Frost, R. O., Marten, P., Lahart, C., & Rosenblate, R. (1990). The dimensions of perfectionism. Cognitive therapy and research, 14, 449-468. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01172967
Gholamaliee, B., Jamoorpour, S., Sori, A., Soheilizad, M., Khazaei, S., Noryian, F., & Bagher, M. (2016). Criteria of marriage in married couples referred to Tuyserkan marriage counseling Center in 2015. Pajouhan Scientific Journal, 14(4), 38-47. (Persian). ‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.21859/psj-140438
Haring, M., Hewitt, P. L., & Flett, G. L. (2003). Perfectionism, coping, and quality of intimate relationships. Journal of marriage and family, 65(1), 143-158.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00143.x
Heydari, S., Azadyekta, M., & Kazemi, A. (2023). Identifying the effective factors on reducing the desire to marry using grounded theory. Social Psychology, 11(67), 51-64. (Persian).
Hewitt, P. L., Mikail, S. F., Dang, S. S., Kealy, D., & Flett, G. L. (2020). Dynamic‐relational treatment of perfectionism: An illustrative case study. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 76(11), 2028-2040.‏ https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23040
Hill, A. P., & Curran, T. (2016). Multidimensional perfectionism and burnout: A meta-analysis. Personality and social psychology review, 20(3), 269-288.‏ https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868315596286
Hill, A. P., Appleton, P. R., & Mallinson, S. H. (2016). Development and initial validation of the Performance Perfectionism Scale for Sport (PPS-S). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 34(7), 653-669.‏ https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282916651354
Hosseinian, S., Abdollahi, A., & Hashemi Golpaygani, F. (2020). Psychometric properties of the Persian version of Moral Perfectionism Scale (MPS-P) in students. Applied Psychology, 14(3), 221-201. (Persian). doi: 10.52547/apsy.2021.215404.0
Hossein Khanzadeh, A., Niyazi, I., Taher, M., Moghtadaei, K., Mehry, S., & Mohammadi, H. (2015). Analyzing and prioritizing of criteria of spouse selection in single students of Guilan University. Journal of psychological science, 14(53), 75-90.‏ (Persian).
Isanejad, O., & Hooshmand, S. (2019). Factor structure, validity and reliability of Mate Selection Criteria Inventory (MSCI) in an Iranian sample. Journal of Family Research, 14(3), 327-344.‏ (Persian).
Kappen, G., Karremans, J. C., Burk, W. J., & Buyukcan-Tetik, A. (2018). On the association between mindfulness and romantic relationship satisfaction: The role of partner acceptance. Mindfulness, 9, 1543-1556.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-018-0902-7
Karremans, J. C., Schellekens, M. P., & Kappen, G. (2017). Bridging the sciences of mindfulness and romantic relationships: A theoretical model and research agenda. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(1), 29-49.‏ https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868315615450
Khadem Dezfuli, Z., Alavi, S. Z., & Shahbazi, M. (2024). The Effectiveness of Emotion Focused Therapy on Alexithymia and Idealistic Marital Expectation in Perfectionism Neurotic Girls. Biannual Journal of Applied Counseling, 14(1), 29-43. (Persian) https://doi.org/10.22055/jac.2023.42791.1931
Malik, S., & Ghayas, S. (2016). Construction and Validation of Academic Perfectionism Scale: Its Psychometric Properties. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 31(1).‏‏ https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2017-03286-015
Mohammadian Khansari, M., & Hosseinzadeh, A. A. (2023). Predicting the attitudes of single young people towards marriage based on personality traits and perfectionism. Journal of Applied Family Therapy, 4(2), 156-172. (Persian).  https://doi.org/10.22034/aftj.2023.339908.1548
Movahedi, A. (2015). Effects of Family, Type of Personality and Perfectionism on Spouse Selection. International Journal of Public Health Research, 5(1), 569-575.‏ https://spaj.ukm.my/ijphr/index.php/ijphr/article/view/183
Shahrabi Farahani, L., Fatehizadeh, P. D., & Etemadi, P. D. (2020). Mate selection criteria among single female teachers: A qualitative study. Quarterly Journal of Family and Research, 17(3), 67-88.‏ (Persian). http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.26766728.1399.17.3.4.0
Shomali Ahmadabadi, M. & Barkhordari Ahmadabadi. A. (2023). The effect of self-belief training based on choice theory on perfectionism and self-efficacy of girls left out of marriage. Cognitive Analytical Psychology Quarterly, 14(52), 77-90. (Persian).
Smith, M. M., Sherry, S. B., Ge, S. Y. J., Hewitt, P. L., Flett, G. L., & Baggley, D. L. (2022). Multidimensional perfectionism turns 30: A review of known knowns and known unknowns. Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne, 63(1), 16–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000288
Stoeber, J. (2012). Dyadic perfectionism in romantic relationships: Predicting relationship satisfaction and longterm commitment. Personality and individual differences, 53(3), 300-305.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.04.002
Terry-Short, L. A., Owens, R. G., Slade, P. D., & Dewey, M. E. (1995). Positive and negative perfectionism. Personality and individual differences, 18(5), 663-668.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(94)00192-U
Tuncay, E. (2006). Predictive role of perfectionism on marital adjustment (Master's thesis, Psychology, Middle East Technical University).‏ https://open.metu.edu.tr/handle/11511/16353
Vacca, M., Terrasi, M., Esposito, R. M., & Lombardo, C. (2022). To be or not to be in a couple: Perfectionism as a predictor. Current Psychology, 41(5), 3165-3172.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00846-6
Yang, H., & Stoeber, J. (2012). The physical appearance perfectionism scale: Development and preliminary validation. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 34, 69-83.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-011-9260-7
Zargar, Y., & Sarami, F. (2022). Socio-political Perfectionism: A Cross-cultural Study. Journal of Modern Psychology, 1(4), 9-21.‏ https://doi.org/10.22034/jmp.2022.324954.1026
 
دوره 14، شماره 2
بهمن 1403
صفحه 23-34

  • تاریخ دریافت 31 مرداد 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 28 شهریور 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 12 آذر 1403