بررسی کفایت روان‫سنجی مقیاس باورهای محدود‫کننده انتخاب همسر

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز

2 دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

چکیده

این پژوهش با هدف بررسی کفایت روان‫سنجی مقیاس باورهای محدود‫کننده همسر بر روی دانشجویان انجام گرفته است. 200 دانشجوی (118 دختر و 82 پسر) دانشگاه شهید چمران به صورت نمونه‫گیری تصادفی چند مرحله‫ای از بین کلیه دانشجویان موجود در این دانشگاه برگزیده شدند و به مقیاس باورهای محدود‫کننده انتخاب همسر پاسخ دادند. تحلیل عاملی (تحلیل مؤلفه‫های اصلی) بر حسب چرخش متعامد (واریماکس) شش عامل را به دست داد. براساس یافته‫‫های به دست آمده ضرایب آلفای کرونباخ کل مقیاس 0/60 و عامل‫‫های‫ یکم تا ششم 0/37 تا 0/78 قابل قبول‫اند و بین نمره کل و عامل‫‫های‫ استخراج شده (به جز عامل پنجم) 0/06 تا 0/70 روایی همگرا دیده می‫شود. به علاوه، مشاهده شد که بین دانشجویان دختر و پسر فقط در عامل‫‫های‫ همخوابی و اطمینان خاطر و نه در کل مقیاس و عامل‫‫های‫ دیگر تفاوت معنادار دیده می‫شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Psychometric Properties of Constraining Beliefs about Mate-Selection Scale in Students

نویسندگان [English]

  • Gholamreza Rajabi 1
  • Sima Ferdosi 2
  • Masoud Shahbazi 1
چکیده [English]

The purpose of this research was to examine the psychometric properties of Constraining Beliefs about Mate Selection scale. 200 (118 female and 82 male) students of ShahidChamranUniversity were selected by randomly multi-stage cluster sampling method and completed 32-item CBMSS. A factor analysis of CBMSS, using the Principal Components Analysis (varimax rotation) resulted in six factors that consisted of 44.14% of variance. Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficients (internal consistency) were satisfactory for the whole scale and for the first to six factors, the extracted factors (except the fifth factor) and the total score showed convergent validity. In addition, there were significant differences between the mean scores of male and female students on the first and third factors, but no significant difference was found between the total the scale and other factors.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • constraining beliefs
  • mate selection
  • validating
Baggarozzi, D. & Rauen, P. (1981). Premarital counseling: Appraisal and status. American Journal of Family Therapy, 9 (3), 13-20.
 
Cobb, N. P., Larson, J. H., & Watson, W. L. (2003). Development of the Attitudes about Romance and Mate Selection Scale. Family Relation, 52, 3, 222-231.
Crosby, J. (1985). Reply to Myth: Perspectives on intimacy: New York: Wily.
Frazier, P. A., & Esterly, E. (1990). Correlates of relationship beliefs: Gender, relationship experience and relating satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 331-352.
Guilford, J. P.(1956). Psychometric Method. New York: MacGraw-Hill.
Larson, J. H. (1992). “You are my one and only”. Premarital counseling for unrealistic beliefs about mate selection. American Journal of Family Therapy, 20, 242-253.
Larson, J. H. (2000). Should We Stay Together? A scientifically proven method for evaluating your relationship and improving its chances for long-term success. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Larson, J. H., & Holman, T. H. (1994). Premarital predictors of marital quality and stability. Family Relations, 43, 228-237.
Larson, A. S., & Olson, D. H. (1989). Predicting marital satisfaction using PREPAPRE: A replicating study. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 15, 311-322.
Lazarus, A. A. (1985). Marital Myths. San   Luis Obispo, CA: Impact.
Lederer, W., & Jackson, D. (1968). The mirage of marriage. New York: W.W. Norton.
McGinnis, A. L. (1990). The Romance Factor. San   Francisco: Harpers.
Murray, S. L., & Holmes, J. G. (1997). A leap of faith? Positive illusions in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 586-604.
Olson, D. H. (1996). Counselors Manual for PREPARE/ENRICH. Minneapolis: Life innovations.
Seltzer, J. A. (2000). Families formed outside of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1247-1268.
Simpson, J. A., Campbell, B., & Bersheid, E. (1986). The association   between romantic love and marriage: Kephart (1967) Twice Revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 3, 363-372.
Sprecher, S., & Metts, S. (1989). Development of the “Romantic Beliefs Scale” and examination of the effects of gender and gender and gender-role orientation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 387-411.
Sprecher, S., & Metts, S. (1999). Romantic beliefs: Their influence on relationships and patterns of change over time. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 16, 834-851.
Waite, L. J., & Gallagher, M. (2000). The Case for Marriage: Why marriage people are happier, healthier, and better off financially. New York: Doubleday.